Ask Question
17 April, 14:16

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, what was the argument of the prosecution from Field's lies?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 17 April, 15:53
    0
    The agrument was Protected by free-speech. The law made it a government crime to erroneously speak to oneself as having gotten any U. S. military beautification or decoration. In the event that sentenced, respondents may have been detained for up to a half year, unless the adornment lied about is the Medal of Honor, in which case detainment could have been dependent upon one year.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, what was the argument of the prosecution from Field's lies? ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers