Ask Question
10 December, 09:02

In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's Story Hour.

Which is a piece of relevant evidence in support of Joshua's claim and reasoning?

A: Without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less literature.

B: The annual circulation of the library is. 5 million volumes. That statistic means that the residents of our city borrowed approximately a half million volumes.

C: Over the years, sitting in a circle with many other children, I must have listened to dozens of wonderful stories and poems.

D: I began attending these weekly events even before I was able to read; I was three or four years old, according to my mother.

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 10 December, 09:53
    0
    A would be the most relevant because it shows a negative consequence to getting rid of Children's Story Hour.
  2. 10 December, 11:29
    0
    I believe it would be a
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers