English

Jewel Beltran

1 March, 03:33

In order to be correct, parenthetical documentation must be A. included at least twice in the document. B. placed right before source information. C. placed right after source information. D. linked to a footnote at the bottom of the page.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “In order to be correct, parenthetical documentation must be A. included at least twice in the document. B. placed right before source ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

A little girl discovers a purse filled with gold coins at the riverbank. She returns the next day to find a fisherman searching frantically near the water. She approaches him and asks what he is looking for.

According to the 6 + 1 Traits of Writing™, organization involves

Where does Gram swipe her eyes from the sadness she is feeling in "Becoming Naomi Leon?"

What are the four main sentence types? give an example of each.?

Media richness theory attempts to classify media in organizations according to a. how technologically advanced the media are. b. how widely the media are used in the workplace. c. how much the media cost to use. d.

New Questions in English

What could Cupid have done to make Tybalt hate Romeo? Nothing, love has nothing to do with it. He could have made Tybalt love the Capulets. He could have hit Tybalt with an iron arrow. He could have hit Romeo with an iron arrow.

Read the stanza below from Lewis Carroll's poem Jabberwocky and choose the parts of speech categorization that most likely fits the gibberish words from the poem.

What is Sofia's life with the mayor like? What is the irony of the situation?

What are two similar parts of speech called when connected by a conjunction?

O'Brien says that the rule of the party is forever. However, the appendix appears to be written in a future time when there is no party. Is this a contradiction in the book?