Ask Question
10 April, 18:38

Lucas is doing a report about the Mexican Revolution. He decides to interview some people he knows about it. First, he talks to his great-grandfather, who lived during the revolution. Lucas's great-grandfather tells him all about the bandits, the bullets, and being a young man enlisted in Pancho Villa's army. Next, Lucas talks to his librarian about the Mexican Revolution. His librarian, Mr. Hanks, was not born yet when the Mexican Revolution occurred but related some quotes from someone he knew who had been through it.

What is one way for Lucas to decide which source is more credible?

Lucas' great-grandfather is more credible because he is a primary source, meaning he was there.

Mr. Hanks is more credible because he is a librarian.

Mr. Hanks is more credible because he quotes people who have been through it.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 10 April, 19:15
    0
    I would say A. Lucas' great-grandfather is more credible because he is a primary source, meaning he was there. The librarian just quotes what he heard from people that where in the war and Lucas's great-grandfather was there.
  2. 10 April, 22:37
    0
    Lucas's great-grandfather was better because he was actually there.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Lucas is doing a report about the Mexican Revolution. He decides to interview some people he knows about it. First, he talks to his ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers