Ask Question
28 May, 11:55

In Cameron's argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction.

Roger Ebert once wrote an article titled, "Video Games Can Never Be Art." In this article he wrote that no game is "worthy of comparison with the great dramatists, poets, filmmakers, novelists, and composers." This may be true right now, but it's inevitable that video games will rise to have just as much or more artistic importance than film, poetry, theater, and television. We're witnessing the childhood phase of the dominant art form of the future.

Which of the following pieces of evidence supports her claim?

A.

The museum of modern art now includes video games.

B.

The video game industry is a multi-billion dollar industry.

C.

Advances in video game graphics are happening faster and faster.

D.

Video games are no longer the domain of children, as more and more adults are starting to enjoy them

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 28 May, 12:03
    0
    I would probably say A. Being that the museum of modern arts have many famous pieces there and for a video game to be included it has to jave some artistic value.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Cameron's argument on the artistic value of video games, she wrote this introduction. Roger Ebert once wrote an article titled, "Video ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers