Ask Question
14 February, 21:22

Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source?

A) because there is not a printed version of it

B) because it can be easily changed by authors without expertise in the field

C) because too many people use it

D) because teachers say so

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 14 February, 23:23
    0
    I would consider (B) to be the answer to this question. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. It can be changed by anyone at anytime.
  2. 15 February, 01:01
    0
    Will there more reason why but I'm going to go with B) because it tends to be changed constantly.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source? A) because there is not a printed version of it B) because it can be easily changed by ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers