Ask Question
13 August, 09:44

Students will eat all of their lunches instead of throwing them away. Lunches would cost more money. Students learn better when they aren't hungry. If more people bought lunches, more people would need to be hired. Students will want to come to school for the good lunches. Students only want junk food.

Which of these arguments do you think would be the most effective if you were arguing for better school lunches?

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 13 August, 13:35
    0
    Students will want to come to school for the good lunches.

    this shows that school lunches should be good because kids go to school for it
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Students will eat all of their lunches instead of throwing them away. Lunches would cost more money. Students learn better when they aren't ...” in 📘 English if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers