Which best analyzes the author's effectiveness in "the date of infamy"?

A. The author is very effective, because he explains the events that led up to pearl harbor and examines how the event affected world politics.

B. The author is somewhat effective; he explains why the attack was important but does not elaborate on how it led to america's involvement in world war ii.

C. The author is not effective; he fails to include the perspectives of Japanese attackers and does not achieve a balanced view of the pearl harbor attacks.

D. The author is somewhat effective; he could have made the text more entertaining by including some interesting characters.

Question

English

Messiah

29 June, 00:13

Which best analyzes the author's effectiveness in "the date of infamy"?

A. The author is very effective, because he explains the events that led up to pearl harbor and examines how the event affected world politics.

B. The author is somewhat effective; he explains why the attack was important but does not elaborate on how it led to america's involvement in world war ii.

C. The author is not effective; he fails to include the perspectives of Japanese attackers and does not achieve a balanced view of the pearl harbor attacks.

D. The author is somewhat effective; he could have made the text more entertaining by including some interesting characters.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Adyson Rich · Answer 1

You might be talking about Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Infamy speech, given just after the pre-emptive attack on Pearl Harbor and the Philippines by the Empire of Japan. The short speech emphasizes on how Japan attacked the United States without first declaring war, and then declaring that the United States is ready to act and do measures for defense.