Ask Question
25 January, 18:01

A shark would not be a good index fossil because

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 25 January, 19:21
    0
    The shark cannot be considered as a good indicator for fossil study. Because the species is known to have survived for a very long period of time.

    Explanation:

    Fossil studies are done by determining the age of the fossil preserved strata or rock. This is done in order to determine the period of time in which a species found as fossil presence.

    Sharks have been known to have survived for a very long duration of time. And, therefore, do not corroborate to a specific period of time. Graptolites and Ammonites are considered as the best index fossils.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A shark would not be a good index fossil because ...” in 📘 Geography if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers