Ask Question
8 March, 12:12

Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question

Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?

Question 1 options:

Animals do not have time to adapt.

Animals always die.

Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.

All of the above.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 8 March, 13:08
    0
    Answer:A.

    Explanation: In a long-term process they have time to adapt and multiply, but in a short term they wont be able to and they will cease to exists.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a ...” in 📘 Geography if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers