Which of the following explains the decision in the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?

The American public's aggressive pushes for a guilty verdict poisoned the jury.

The judge was able to hand down a just verdict despite Red Scare hysteria.

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict.

The two men were rightly convicted for their acts of wrongdoing.

Question

History

Mariam Stewart

30 July, 05:23

Which of the following explains the decision in the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?

The American public's aggressive pushes for a guilty verdict poisoned the jury.

The judge was able to hand down a just verdict despite Red Scare hysteria.

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict.

The two men were rightly convicted for their acts of wrongdoing.

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Marlene Kemp · Answer 1

The answer is " The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict". Civil liberty was not given to these two men who were forced to speak out their political opinions. Anti-radical movements had rallied on because they believed that these Italian merchants were innocent and were framed from such accusation.

Theodore Galloway · Answer 2

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict