A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must apply national law to commerce within their borders. could prohibit any commerce within their borders. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

Question

History

Taylor Valencia

27 August, 02:00

A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must apply national law to commerce within their borders. could prohibit any commerce within their borders. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Porter Romero · Answer 1

A result of the Gibbo V. Ogden (1824) decision was that state could regulate commerce only within their borders. This was a landmark decision in which united state supreme that held the power to regulate interstate commerce. The landmark was considered decision with ripple effect that lasted for 1000 years.