Ask Question
20 August, 20:45

In New York Times versus Sullivan the Supreme Court ruled that statements about public figures are examples of libel only when they are made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 20 August, 21:06
    0
    In the year 1964, the Supreme Court established guidelines for identifying whether some public officials could be suited for libel and win. In order to achieve the goal, the individuals must prove the wrong and malicious statements which should be made with "actual malice" and faking it.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In New York Times versus Sullivan the Supreme Court ruled that statements about public figures are examples of libel only when they are ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers