Ask Question
7 April, 15:23

In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 7 April, 17:18
    0
    It was unconstitutional--they overturned the Betts decision because they stated it violated the 14th Amendment requiring due process.

    The Betts decision stated a federal crime did not require a person have an attorney. However, the case of Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the original decision. They stated in all court cases a person has the right to an attorney.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers