Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact

Question

History

Guest

11 July, 21:43

Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Van Walton · Answer 1

Because the facts were dealt with at the trial.

You were convicted there.

The appeals process is to see if matters of law were violated in your case.

That is why you must have "grounds for appeal" for your appeal to move forward.