Ask Question
22 May, 16:56

How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act?

a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands.

b. tribes had no right to any land in the new territories.

c. tribes had to abide by the decisions of the united states.

d. tribes would receive rent from farmers using their land?

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 22 May, 19:58
    0
    I believe the answer is c
  2. 22 May, 20:28
    0
    A is the answer. They can stay on their lands but they don't hold any titles to those lands
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act? a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands. b. tribes had no right to any ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers