Read this excerpt from the majority opinion in a supreme court case.[w]e cannot say that a law which authorizes or even requires the separation of the two races in public conveyances is unreasonable. 1which case is the excerpt most likely from

Question

History

Jerry Yang

8 August, 06:56

Read this excerpt from the majority opinion in a supreme court case.[w]e cannot say that a law which authorizes or even requires the separation of the two races in public conveyances is unreasonable. 1which case is the excerpt most likely from

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Carlo Vazquez · Answer 1

Carlo Vazquez 8 August, 08:19

0

Plessy v. Ferguson is the answer

Williams · Answer 2

This is from the Supreme Court case Plessy vs. Ferguson.

This 1896 case is considered a landmark ruling, as this allowed for the doctrine of "separate but equal" to be used in public places around the country. This case was used as a means to create segregated schools, churches, restaurants, etc.

This statement, written by Justice Brown, refers to the fact that nowhere in the constitution does it explicitly discuss this idea of separating races. Says it is not discussed, the court argues that this idea is not unreasonable. The Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling will change American society for the next 70 years.