Ask Question
27 September, 01:16

A result of the gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states,

A. Must not interfere with commerce between individuals.

B. Must apply national law to commerce within their boarders.

C. Could prohibit any commerce within their boarders.

D. Could regulate commerce only within their boarders.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 27 September, 02:40
    0
    A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states, D. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

    This decision had to do with regulating commerce and trade, as well as navigation within the states themselves. It created new rules for interstate commerce by giving the Congress more rights and powers to regulate this.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “A result of the gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states, A. Must not interfere with commerce between individuals. B. Must apply ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers