Ask Question
12 April, 03:50

What did alexander hamilton argue about war in federalist no. 69? a surprise attack on the united states is the only justification for war by presidential action. building a strong military for engagement in foreign wars would be a key ingredient to establishing executive authority. a president should be allowed to declare war, because only the executive can react quickly enough. war under any circumstances is unjust, even in self-defense. congress is the only body with enough deliberative powers to be able to justly declare war?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 12 April, 06:32
    0
    The correct answer is a surprise attack on the united states is the only justification for war by presidential action

    He believed that the president should have no rights to initiate a war without the congress and that the only excuse would be a surprise attack from a foreign power. This was mostly the practice that the presidents upheld but there were some cases where various loopholes were exploited to wage war without the congress.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “What did alexander hamilton argue about war in federalist no. 69? a surprise attack on the united states is the only justification for war ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers