Ask Question
18 May, 21:39

Several forensic anthropologists have dealt with the aftermath of Argentina’s "Dirty War" (1970s and 1980s) during which many people disappeared. Which of the following techniques would be inappropriate for anthropologists to use in attempting to find and identify these individuals? a) creating a glossary of the local language, using methods of linguistic anthropologyb) excavating mass graves, using archaeological techniquesc) talking to locals who were alive at the time, using ethnographic methods of cultural anthropologyd) studying skeletons, using methods of physical anthropology

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 19 May, 00:43
    0
    All of them except B and D that clearly belong to Forensic anthropology

    Explanation:

    Forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws. Antropology is the study of the relationship of human beings with their surrounding.

    A is not forensic B is an almost perfect definition of etnographic field work of antropologists. Almost because talking to locals who were alive doesn't make sense.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Several forensic anthropologists have dealt with the aftermath of Argentina’s "Dirty War" (1970s and 1980s) during which many people ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers