History

Cheyanne

9 October, 19:12

A historian's interpretation of a subject should

be biased.

1.) sometimes

2.) always

3.) never

+1

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “A historian's interpretation of a subject should be biased. 1.) sometimes 2.) always 3.) never ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Traveling minstrels and beggars told the people the news true false

Why where european countries able to conquer so much of the world

What attracted people to the city of florence

What was one reason why Russians were uncomfortable with the rapid changes occurring in their country in the 1980s

How many social classes was the French society divided into?

New Questions in History

Members of the 1960s counterculture movement were often called A. doves. B. hawks. C. hippies. D. hipsters.

When is it important to try to determine the credibility of a source? Why is it important?

How did Greek scientists change the way people viewed and understood the natural world around them?

What child labor was like during the progressive era? What laws exist today to protect child workers? Evidence from other countries that shows how child labor has contributed?

1. What do Mexicans believe the dead do on the Day of the Dead?