Ask Question
15 October, 08:43

Which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during World War I and World War II? More soldiers died as a result of incorrect blood typing. More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home. More donations were needed as a result of poor storage techniques. More organizations spoke out against the war.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 15 October, 09:13
    0
    Option B) More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.
  2. 15 October, 11:24
    0
    More soldiers who had lost a limb returned home.

    Explanation:

    Losing a limb in combat is a life-threatening injury because of the extreme blood loss, and the possibility of infection. The fact that more amputated soldiers were able to return home after World War II than World War I is a telling sing that medical professionals improved their methods to handle with haemorrhages.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which was most likely an effect on society that resulted from improvements in blood handling during World War I and World War II? More ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers