Ask Question
17 January, 10:51

How were the Indian territory's coal and lead-zinc mining towns different from one another?

A. Lead-zinc towns were more overcrowded and less organized.

B. Lead-zinc towns had company stores, and workers were paid in scrip.

C. Coal towns were smaller and often were run by individuals.

D. Coal towns had few enclaves and did not attract immigrants.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 17 January, 11:49
    0
    A. Lead-zinc towns were more overcrowded and less organized.
  2. 17 January, 13:59
    0
    Lead - Zinc towns were more overcrowded and less organized (A)

    Explanation:

    The Indian territory's coal towns were more organized when compared to Lead - Zinc towns because they coal towns were not a very attractive place for immigrants hence they had lesser populations and the lesser the population a town has the less likely for it to be disorganized.

    The Lead - Zinc towns were larger and attracted alot of immigrants because of the lucrative nature of Lead and Zinc then. and this made the towns overcrowded and less organized when compared to the coal towns in the Indian territory
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “How were the Indian territory's coal and lead-zinc mining towns different from one another? A. Lead-zinc towns were more overcrowded and ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers