In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal record. B. puts public safety at immediate risk. C. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. D. is someone the arresting officer already knows.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspectA. already has a criminal ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did growing social and gender hierarchies and expanding networks of trade increase the complexity of human society in the neothlithic period?
Answers (1)
True or false? The attack on Tokyo surprised the Japanese because they were told the U. S. planes could not get close without detection.
Answers (1)
What region does cotton grow in 1850
Answers (1)
Why did federalists target immagrints in the alien and sedition act
Answers (1)
Why were both Hamilton and Jefferson writing to George Washington? Based on both of these letters what seems to have been happening in George Washington's administration? How can you tell?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Marley is writing an essay on the civilizations of the Mediterranean and the Aegean. Read her essay, and choose the appropriate word or phrase to fill in each blank.
Answers (1)
Who were John Wycliffe, Desiderius Eramus, and Martin Luther and what did they have in common?
Answers (1)
Either the House or Senate can a bill.
Answers (2)
Did the puritans allow people to practice any religion?
Answers (1)
Which of the following statements about similarities and differences between the government of the Roman Republic and the U. S. government is false? Both governments have three branches. Like the U. S.
Answers (1)