Ask Question
8 December, 22:11

Which of the following was not a positive effect of farming tribes slash and burn technique?

A. it provides fertilizer for crops

B. it slowed the growth of weeds

C. it removed blocking trees

D. it softened the tough prairie sod

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 9 December, 01:01
    0
    Slash-and-burn agriculture, also called fire-fallow cultivation, is a farming method that involves the cutting and burning of plants in a forest or woodland to create a field called a swidden. The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle. In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following was not a positive effect of farming tribes slash and burn technique? A. it provides fertilizer for crops B. it ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers