History

Josue Sparks

15 June, 19:01

One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?

one historian did not examine primary sources

one of the historians' research has serious flaws

they used different secondary sources for research

their interpretations of historical facts vary

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

How did mummification reflect Egyptian beliefs about the afterlife?

Why did the students protesters sit outside the Demorcratic National Convention'

How did the arrival of the dutch, british, and french on the world scene in the 17th and 18th centuries affect africa, southeast asia, india, china and japan?

In what time (Years) God promised the "promised land" to Abraham and his ancestors?

How did the Roman Republic fall

New Questions in History

Which weapon might have inflicted the greatest damage on the enemy in World War 1?

Select the region where the following landform is found: Bayous A.) Appalachian Highlands B.) Coastal Plains C.) Great Plains

In what ways did reagan try to fulfill the goal of less government involvement in the economy

Was new netherlands also new amsterdam

Which best describes conservation, as it applies to environmentalism? A.) the preservation and protection of land and other natural resources for enjoyment by future generations B.