To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians
generally
O
A. simplify the information to make sure that nonhistorians can
analyze it.
O
B. determine whether the information supports their existing claims.
O
C. develop rhetoric to convince others that the evidence is strong,
O
D. check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other
sources.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians generally O A. simplify the information to make sure that ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What is the meaning of the word prejudice?
Answers (1)
The quebec act (1774) established french civil law and the roman catholic church in quebec. a. True b. False
Answers (1)
Who had control of the senate for more than 30 years?
Answers (1)
Simony allowed people to avoid paying taxes to the church. t or f
Answers (1)
What lured migrant workers to the far west? transportation improvements economic opportunity government programs better treatment
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
by the mid-nineteenth century, a combination of factors caused the great___ herds to fall into decline
Answers (1)
In 1938, Congress established the House Un-American Activities Committee, which: a. focused on racism and white supremacy in the South. b. focused on fascism and ultranationalists. c.
Answers (1)
What type of landform covers much of switzerland and austria?
Answers (1)
What are the titles of the presiding officers of the House and the Senate?
Answers (1)
How does the omaha platform identify the main threats to american liberty?
Answers (1)