To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians
generally
O
A. simplify the information to make sure that nonhistorians can
analyze it.
O
B. determine whether the information supports their existing claims.
O
C. develop rhetoric to convince others that the evidence is strong,
O
D. check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other
sources.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians generally O A. simplify the information to make sure that ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Who is the legislative branch
Answers (1)
Why did the Powhatan Indians and the Jamestown settlers become enemies?
Answers (1)
How was Franklin D. Roosevelt's approach to fighting the depression different than Herbert Hoover's approach?
Answers (1)
After the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, President Johnson
Answers (1)
Does Wilson think the United States should enter WW1? Why or why not?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
During the years 1870 to 1900 labor and management battle for control over wages and working conditions
Answers (1)
Why did african american migrants from the south experience prejudice from some blacks in the north?
Answers (1)
The articles of conderation was the name given to the first constition of the united states
Answers (1)
What is the new testament?
Answers (2)
England's glorious revolution created the necessary climate to increase the power of the
Answers (1)