McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it
1) applied the Second Amendment to state government.
2) rejected the idea that the Second Anendment applies to state government.
3) conclued that the Second Amendment applies only to state governments and not to the federal government
4) upheld the state of llinois's restrictions on gun ownership by former felons.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it 1) applied the Second Amendment to state government. 2) rejected the idea that the ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Neolithic age in a sentence
Answers (1)
Which best describes the reaction of other Southern states to South Carolina's secession?
Answers (1)
When was the department of health and human services created?
Answers (1)
Establishing an Arab-Israeli peace is difficult because both sides refuse to negotiate. occupy conquered areas. view each other as enemies. want to gain a defendable border.
Answers (1)
Define the term Qur'an
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which is identifying characteristics of pularlism
Answers (1)
Which of the following was a reason why a nation uses propaganda in a time of war? A. To unite their people in opposition and protest of the war B. To unite their people behind the war effort C.
Answers (2)
What was one outcome of the ottoman empires control of trade and taxation on goods throughout much of Asia? A. the ottoman empire became too large and wealthy to govern efficiently, and fell into civil war B.
Answers (1)
Me. Hunter asked his friends if they like rap music. He discovers that 1 out of 2 of his friends like rap music. What percent is this?
Answers (1)
Is immigrants filling up the united states and why
Answers (1)