Ask Question
14 June, 16:46

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it

1) applied the Second Amendment to state government.

2) rejected the idea that the Second Anendment applies to state government.

3) conclued that the Second Amendment applies only to state governments and not to the federal government

4) upheld the state of llinois's restrictions on gun ownership by former felons.

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 14 June, 18:04
    0
    The correct answer is 1

    Explanation: It considered that an individual's right to "keep and bear arms"
  2. 14 June, 19:40
    0
    applied the Second Amendment to state government.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “McDonald v. Chicago (2010) was significant because it 1) applied the Second Amendment to state government. 2) rejected the idea that the ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers