Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portraying violence in

Boston as:

A. an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists.

B. a misunderstanding between British and colonial forces.

C. a crime for which soldiers were punished.

D. a showing of colonial military might.

Question

History

Charlie Harrington

31 March, 06:43

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portraying violence in

Boston as:

A. an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists.

B. a misunderstanding between British and colonial forces.

C. a crime for which soldiers were punished.

D. a showing of colonial military might.

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Vasquez · Answer 1

The correct answer is A) an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists.

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portraying violence in Boston as: "an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists."

We are referring to the Boston Massacre of March 5, 1770, in Boston, Massachusetts. What began as a street fight on King Street, ended as one of the most horrible massacres in that time. British soldiers killed many colonists and this incident was one of the causes that led to the Revolutionary War, as well as the many taxes colonists had to pay such as the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Tea Act or the Townshend Acts.

Dominique Hays · Answer 2

The answer is A

Explanation

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams needed to make it look like the British were the scource of the problem

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portraying violence inBoston as:A. an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists.B. a misunderstanding between British and colonial forces.C. a crime for which soldiers were punished.D. a showing of colonial military might.

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portraying violence in

Boston as:

A. an attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists.

B. a misunderstanding between British and colonial forces.

C. a crime for which soldiers were punished.

D. a showing of colonial military might.