The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that

Answer: The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.

Explanation: In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.