Which most accurately explains the role played by debates over popular sovereignty in causing the Civil War?

1. They convinced federal government to establish more colonies, that allowed slavery in order to maintain a balance between free and slave states.

2. They prevented slaves from being used in northern factories.

3. They lent credibility to the slave uprisings that the abolitionists support in an effort to start the beginning of the civil war.

4. They led to arguments about the role citizens should play in determining the legality of slavery in their home states and territories.

Question

History

Lea Soto

17 March, 05:40

Which most accurately explains the role played by debates over popular sovereignty in causing the Civil War?

1. They convinced federal government to establish more colonies, that allowed slavery in order to maintain a balance between free and slave states.

2. They prevented slaves from being used in northern factories.

3. They lent credibility to the slave uprisings that the abolitionists support in an effort to start the beginning of the civil war.

4. They led to arguments about the role citizens should play in determining the legality of slavery in their home states and territories.

+1

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Litzy Ashley · Answer 1

the correct answer is D

4. They led to arguments about the role citizens should play in determining the legality of slavery in their home states and territories.

popular sovereignity grew in the 1840s and was response to debates over western expansion. It argued that in a democracy, residents of a territory, and not the larger federal government, should be allowed to decide on slavery within their borders.

Enzo Chase · Answer 2

4. They led to arguments about the role citizens should play in determining the legality of slavery in their home states and territories.

Explanation:

Popular sovereignty in nineteenth century America rose as a trade off procedure for deciding if a Western domain would allow or deny subjection. First advanced during the 1840s because of discussions over western development, well known sway contended that in a majority rule government, occupants of a domain, and not the national government, ought to be permitted to choose bondage inside their fringes. In 1854, Stephen Douglas most broadly endeavored to actualize the measure with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. A noteworthy result of prevalent sway's application was the surge by both star and abolitionist subjection powers to populate Kansas and decide its destiny, which showed in savagery and misrepresentation.