The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as

a compromise.

a vote against racial quotas.

a vote for racial quotas.

a victory for medical students.

Question

History

Tomas Mueller

27 June, 18:15

The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as

a compromise.

a vote against racial quotas.

a vote for racial quotas.

a victory for medical students.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Laylah Klein · Answer 1

Confirmed: a comprise

Robles · Answer 2

a) compromise.

Explanation:

The case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a case ruled by the US Supreme Court about racial quotas in universities.

It is considered a compromise because the decision declared racial quotas unconstitutional, but also decided that race can be used as a criteria in the admissions decisions of universities.

The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described asa compromise.a vote against racial quotas.a vote for racial quotas.a victory for medical students.

The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as

a compromise.

a vote against racial quotas.

a vote for racial quotas.

a victory for medical students.