Ask Question
27 June, 18:15

The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as

a compromise.

a vote against racial quotas.

a vote for racial quotas.

a victory for medical students.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 27 June, 18:44
    0
    Confirmed: a comprise
  2. 27 June, 18:45
    0
    a) compromise.

    Explanation:

    The case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a case ruled by the US Supreme Court about racial quotas in universities.

    It is considered a compromise because the decision declared racial quotas unconstitutional, but also decided that race can be used as a criteria in the admissions decisions of universities.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as a compromise. a vote against racial quotas. a vote for racial quotas. a ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers