Ask Question
29 December, 12:35

I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the:

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 29 December, 15:14
    0
    If your answers choices are

    a: freedom of assembly

    b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure

    c: protection against double jeopardy

    d: right to avoid self-incrimination

    Then the correct answer is B protection against unreasonable search and seizure
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “I'm Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the: ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers