Ask Question
5 January, 23:00

Which of the following BEST illustrates the process of the Supreme Court's review of a case? A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written B. lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written C. opinions are written >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote D. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> opinions are written >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 6 January, 00:49
    0
    C

    Explanation:

    I choose C as my answer because the answer in A was wrong, a writ is the option after written opinions. B was also wrong because lawyers preparing briefs and presenting need to plan before doing that and to make sure the Supreme Court understands the situation. D is also wrong because it starts just like A.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following BEST illustrates the process of the Supreme Court's review of a case? A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers