When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What famous monument was dedicated on memorial day in 1922?
Answers (1)
Indo-European tribes came to the Fertile Crescent from the steppes north of the?
Answers (1)
How did the relationship between parliament and the restoration change following the civil war
Answers (1)
Interesting facts about peter the great?
Answers (2)
Why was the battle of saratoga a so important in the war of independence
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Describe the distribution of seats in the House of Representatives. Explain your answer.
Answers (2)
Which of the following religions does NOT have a core group of sacred scriptures? Buddhism Hinduism Shinto
Answers (1)
In what way is the Qur*an similar to holy books of other religions
Answers (1)
What countries were part of the age of enlightenment?
Answers (1)
When did First Nations begin trading with the Europeans
Answers (2)