When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
The practice of planting tending and harvesting crops most likely
Answers (1)
1. What was the only powerful institution to survive the fall of the Roman Empire?
Answers (2)
The building of the transcontinental railroad provide many jobs especially for immigrants. Which two immigrant groups completed much of the work on the transcontinental railroad
Answers (2)
Which factor play a major role in the decline of the Ottoman Empire
Answers (2)
How did Augustus change the Roman republic
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Sankskrit is (A) a city on the Ganges River in northern India (B) one of the major Hindu gods (C) the language of the Aryans (D) the location of a major battle between the Aryans and invaders
Answers (1)
Which plundered and burned Patriot farms, killing men, women, and children? Francis Marion's men Lord Cornwallis's forces Loyalist bands Benedict Arnold's soldiers
Answers (1)
Which city below were the Jews exiled from? Sidon Babylon Jerusalem Palestine Cyprus
Answers (1)
The league of nations did not prevent German and Italian aggression against other nations because it ... A) had no standing army and no real power to enforce decrees.
Answers (1)
The Turkish invader Akbar did what
Answers (2)