When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event
+5
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Home » History » When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is written by an academic professional O C.