Ask Question
29 February, 02:40

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have

over primary sources for historians?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 29 February, 05:04
    0
    Primary sources provide a first-hand account of an event or time period and are considered to be authoritative. They represent original thinking, reports on discoveries or events, or they can share new information.

    On the other hand, secondary sources often use generalizations, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources.

    Therefore, primary sources provide the most accurate information. If you need simple, unaltered information about an event, use a primary source.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers