Ask Question
31 December, 16:25

Which best describes the difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty? A. A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. B. A territory that was free soil was open to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. C. A territory that had popular sovereignty was open to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. D. A territory that had popular sovereignty was closed to slavery, while one that was free soil was allowed to vote on the slavery issue. E. A territory that was free soil accepted the Homestead Act of 1862, while one that had popular sovereignty did not.

+5
Answers (2)
  1. 31 December, 19:49
    0
    The answer is option A. A territory that was free soil was closed to slaver, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.
  2. 31 December, 20:03
    0
    A. A territory that was free soil was closed to slavery, while one that had popular sovereignty was allowed to vote on the slavery issue.

    Explanation:

    A territory that was considered to be "free-soil" was a territory that was closed to slavery. This means that slavery was, by law, not allowed within this territory. On the other hand, a territory that was considered to have popular sovereignty was one in which people had the right to self-determination. This meant that they were entitled to vote on the slavery issue and decide their position for themselves.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which best describes the difference between the free-soil territories and those that had popular sovereignty? A. A territory that was free ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers