Why did American isolation grow after WWI? Today there are some factions in the US that do not want our country involved in ground actions against terrorists in the Middle East, such as ground action aka "boots on the ground" against ISIS while other factions think we should take action. What do you think we should do?

The reasons for American isolation at the beginning of the twentieth century are quite different from those reasons in our contemporary moment. After World War I, Americans were deeply disillusioned by the horrific nature of the war ranging from the use of chemical gas, aerial bombardment, tank warfare, and trench warfare. Contemporary concerns about US involvement in the world are based on the Vietnam experience. Most Americans felt the aims of the war were poorly defined and its escalation was largely concealed from the American public. Since Vietnam, Americans have been leery of any protracted U. S. military engagement that is not properly defined in terms of aims and duration. The best example of this concern was the US invasion of Iraq during the second term of George W. Bush.

The reason behind the US isolation growth was due to the negative impact of the war on the soldiers. The correct thing to do in a debate about taking part in the fight against terrorism is that it requires a solution of contention but not a big scale war. So the military actions should be defensivee.

Explanation:

All right, after world war I there where many American soldiers' death, also the survivors were wounded physically or emotionally. The loss of them caused big wholes in American society and people resented it very hard. Therefore, the U. S. established that they were not going to participate in another incursion to save Europe from themselves. However, everything changed when Germany and japan attacked the U. S. Now, about the debate in a fight against terrorism. We should take a military defensive stance. And attack them with geopolitical strategies that don't spread violence close to innocent people.