History

Taylor Hurst

6 April, 16:02

What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?

A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.

C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they

wished.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question ✅ “What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free? A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process. B. Scott now ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

Does anyone know the answers to plato's world history b unit 2?

What date was puerto rico discovered?

According to woolf what has been forgotten from elizabethan history apex

define in sentence form: treaty of 96, declaration of independence, and the articles of confederation

Who argued in the 1960s that society creates deviance and deviant individuals by responding in particular ways to behaviors and actions?

New Questions in History

How did the acquisition of Guam in the Spanish-American War affect US trade? It allowed the US to increase exports from Hawaii. It allowed the US to increase trade with China. It allowed the US to increase trade with Japan.

What was the role of the Committees of Correspondence which formed in the years before the American Revolution?

Following the death of Aristotle, Greek learning in philosophy and science

Why did the Weimar Republic collapse? The government had to take out extensive loans. Many individuals were out of work because of the war. Citizens felt that the government did not serve their needs.

Was christopher columbus the first to discover America