Ask Question
12 August, 23:49

Based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper trial? What argument could be made for holding suspected terrorists without formally charging them with crimes and giving them a day in US court?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 13 August, 03:11
    0
    A good answer should contain the following:

    Possible Answers:

    Arguments against

    We would be violating our own legal standards by not giving these people a free and fair trial.

    Offering open trials would prove to the rest of the world that we have a fair and open society.

    It is morally right to give each person accused of a crime a chance to defend themselves.

    Arguments for

    These people are dangerous and should not be allowed in the United States

    The suspects were captured in battle zones and should be treated as enemy fighters, not criminals.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper trial? What ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers