In the Fawkes v. Texas trial, defense attorney Sunil Sharma wanted to question his defendant's accuser in court. Which constitutional clause can Sharma invoke to do so?

Question

History

Miya Harding

27 October, 10:30

In the Fawkes v. Texas trial, defense attorney Sunil Sharma wanted to question his defendant's accuser in court. Which constitutional clause can Sharma invoke to do so?

+2

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Valery Baldwin · Answer 1

Sharma should invoke the confrontation clause of the 6th Amendment which gives the accused the right to question their accuser.

Jerimiah Hansen · Answer 2

The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Explanation:

There is said, verbatim: "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him."

All this means that the accused must, is legal duty, to have a face-to-face confrontation, be present there to be asked.