Ask Question
21 January, 14:03

Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put these questions to American presidents and generals and to high-ranking Soviet officers. Since Moscow and Washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their "production"? That not a single Allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on Auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. Birkenau was "processing" ten thousand Jews a day. Stopping a single convoy for a single night-or even for just a few hours-would have prolonged so many lives.

Based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that

A) it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs.

B) people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice.

C) countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong.

D) Moscow and Washington are to be blamed for the Holocaust.

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 21 January, 15:47
    0
    B. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice.
  2. 21 January, 17:51
    0
    I think the answer is letter A. it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs.

    In a war, there are some incidents that countries try to avoid to set fire on because they have to consider the effects that confrontation can bring to their country. Sometimes even if lived were taken in the process they try not to put focus on it and balance the pros and cons of situations.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put these ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers