Anti-Federalists argued that

A branches of government would keep each other in balance. B it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. C the Constitution would create a Republican government. D a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Question

History

Makenzie

1 June, 05:39

Anti-Federalists argued that

A branches of government would keep each other in balance. B it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. C the Constitution would create a Republican government. D a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Cheddar · Answer 1

They argued B. It was impossible to separate government into equal branches

Anti-federalists were against all parts of the Constitution because they thought one branch would become too strong and become oppresive like Great Britain

Anti-Federalists argued thatA branches of government would keep each other in balance. B it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. C the Constitution would create a Republican government. D a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Anti-Federalists argued that

A branches of government would keep each other in balance. B it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. C the Constitution would create a Republican government. D a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.