Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

a. effective secondary source document

b. too biased for historical evidence

c. too focused for historical evidence

d. unreliable narrative source

e. useful primary source document

Question

History

Kaiden Bray

22 January, 00:29

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

a. effective secondary source document

b. too biased for historical evidence

c. too focused for historical evidence

d. unreliable narrative source

e. useful primary source document

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Dobie · Answer 1

It would be an "a. effective secondary source document" that best describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event, since the information as had time to "settle"--although of course this doesn't automatically mean that the chart is "effective".

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?a. effective secondary source documentb. too biased for historical evidencec. too focused for historical evidenced. unreliable narrative sourcee. useful primary source document

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

a. effective secondary source document

b. too biased for historical evidence

c. too focused for historical evidence

d. unreliable narrative source

e. useful primary source document