Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?
A:In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights.
B:In Miranda v. Arizona, the Supreme Court decided that it is the citizens' responsibility to be aware of their own rights.
C:In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court decided that every person who was convicted at trial and did not have an attorney deserves a new trial.
D:In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that every state must provide an attorney when the defendant cannot afford one.
+5
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described? A:In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Home » History » Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described? A:In Miranda v. Arizona the Supreme Court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights. B:In Miranda v.