Ask Question
12 February, 01:56

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing historical event

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 12 February, 03:10
    0
    Because a primary resource would be an interview of someone in that event or their diary or something they wrote about that event. If you couldnt find anything, you would have to use the secondary source, a book or article written about that event but the author wasnt in it or there
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing historical event ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers