Ask Question
HistoryHistory
28 February, 21:43

Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 1 March, 00:09
    0
    They were weak. They don't have much power with that title. Most of the power were in the hands of nobles and the upper class. They make more decisions than the monarch. They don't have their own army
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Do you think February is a good time for Black History Month? Why or why not?
Answers (2)
How did the "corrupt bargain" affect the US political party system in the 1820s?
Answers (1)
What Created a written set of laws to rule their civilization?
Answers (1)
Why did the us think pearl harbor was more likely to suffer sabotage instead of a military attack?
Answers (1)
Why did the allies attack civilian and military targets in Japan
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which african climate zone is home to the savanna? A. tropical wet B. tropical wet and dry c. semiarid d. arid
Answers (1)
What was the name of the route used by the North Vietnamese to smuggle weapons into South Vietnam?
Answers (1)
How do you make a test
Answers (2)
What does it mean to be "endowed with unalienable right"?
Answers (1)
The Maastricht Treaty was a plan to reduce nuclear arms in Europe. true or false?
Answers (1)
Home » History » Compared to other monarchs in Europe, kings and queens in England before 1600 were
Sign Up Forgot Password?