Ask Question
18 November, 02:49

Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.?

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 18 November, 03:53
    0
    A researcher uses Primary sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts of the witnesses that physically watched it happen. their accounts are often more reliable.
  2. 18 November, 04:53
    0
    researcher uses Primary Sources because they are often more reliable, because they are the accounts that are documented that shows how something or someone tested and successful did.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “Why does a researcher use primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event.? ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers