Ask Question
17 February, 16:29

In Dred Scott's court case, Scott argued he should be free because he had lived in

A) Missouri and Maine.

B) California and Virginia.

C) Kansas and Nebraska.

D) Illinois and Wisconsin.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 17 February, 20:00
    0
    D. Illinois and Wisconsin because Dr. Emerson took Dred Scott there, and he claimed freedom because they were above the 36/30 line and therefore ruled as free
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Dred Scott's court case, Scott argued he should be free because he had lived in A) Missouri and Maine. B) California and Virginia. C) ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers