Ask Question
Today, 04:50

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands?

a. Their action did not negatively influence other students.

b. Their action was not disruptive.

c. Their action occurred off school grounds.

d. Their action was political speech.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. Today, 07:14
    0
    The answer is B their action was never disruptive
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question ✅ “In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands? a. Their action did not negatively influence ...” in 📘 History if you're in doubt about the correctness of the answers or there's no answer, then try to use the smart search and find answers to the similar questions.
Search for Other Answers